Re: Upgrading 1.3.1 -> 2.0 (was Re: predepends on libc6?)
Scott Ellis <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> Doing so will only mess up stuff that needs perl, and only until
> /etc/ld.so.conf is fixed and ldconfig is run.
You underestimate the importance of a working perl in Debian.
> My definition of smash was overwriting libc5 libraries by their
> libc6 equivilant and making a libc5 package unfixable. I admit it is
> a problem, just not as serious of one as libreadline used to be.
libreadline never did that to the best of my knowledge.
 On i386 anyway, on m68k for a couple of releases the libc5
versions of libreadline were linked with both libc5 and libc6 but,
that's a) not the same thing and b) I doubt you were referring to it.
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
Trouble? e-mail to email@example.com .