Re: HURD
> But if we were considering Debian GNU/HURD, then the HURD would
> only be the kernel, so would be free to do what we want with the file
> system. Just like any linux distribution can use something other than
> the FSSTND/FHS ..
if you want to go this way :
the kernel differs, and some small utilities maybe
(clock, mount, umount, ps, makedev and such stuff), but all big programs
stay the same.
it's worth a try, and shouldn't be __so__ much work.
have fun.
andreas
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: Red Hat 5.0 Release date
- From: "Gonzalo A. Diethelm" <gonzo@ing.puc.cl>
- HURD
- From: Tigger --Bitop aka Shift Left <tigger@bitburn.org>
- Re: HURD
- From: Andreas Jellinghaus <aj@dungeon.inka.de>
- Re: HURD
- From: Hamish Moffatt <hamish@debian.org>