Re: Debian will move glibc-2.1?
On Sun, Nov 23, 1997 at 02:26:25PM +0900, Araki Yasuhiro wrote:
> > IMO, glibc 2.1 is still too volatile for general use. You are free to
> > build and use it yourself.
> OK, I try to glibc 2.1 on my own risk.
> But, I have to maintain some Debian package.(Just beta test in Japanese
> Debian users group.)
> If I install glibc2.1 on my hamm environment, can I maintain
> Debian package for glibc 2.0?
Yes, but you'll have to install glibc 2.1 so it is not used by default
when you compile something.
David Engel ODS Networks
firstname.lastname@example.org 1001 E. Arapaho Road
(972) 234-6400 Richardson, TX 75081
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
Trouble? e-mail to email@example.com .