[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Debian will move glibc-2.1?

On Sun, Nov 23, 1997 at 02:26:25PM +0900, Araki Yasuhiro wrote:
> > IMO, glibc 2.1 is still too volatile for general use.  You are free to
> > build and use it yourself.
> OK, I try to glibc 2.1 on my own risk.
> But, I have to maintain some Debian package.(Just beta test in Japanese
> Debian users group.) 
> If I install glibc2.1 on my hamm environment, can I maintain 
> Debian package for glibc 2.0?

Yes, but you'll have to install glibc 2.1 so it is not used by default
when you compile something.

David Engel                        ODS Networks
david@sw.ods.com                   1001 E. Arapaho Road
(972) 234-6400                     Richardson, TX  75081

TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org . 
Trouble?  e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .

Reply to: