Re: New bug Severity for release-goals?
On 23-Nov-1997, Mark Baker <mbaker@iee.org> wrote:
> In article <m0xZadt-001NHbC@night>,
> dark@xs4all.nl (Richard Braakman) writes:
>
> > * Link shared libs against other shared libs instead of static [14]
>
> What you mean is `link shared libs so they contain dependency information'.
>
> If you don't do that, ldd says `statically linked' but that's just a very
> misleading error, since libraries are never statically linked.
The entire Debian policy on shared libs is still unclear to me.
There are some explanations of how dpkg-sharedlibs works in the Debian
manuals, and other things, but I don't really understand what is
required. If this is going to be a 2.0 requirement, it might be a
good idea for someone who knows what is going on to clarify the
policy manual, developers manual, or both.
--
Tyson Dowd #
# Linux versus Windows is a
trd@cs.mu.oz.au # Win lose situation.
http://www.cs.mu.oz.au/~trd #
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: