Re: Missing pieces of developer docs?

[Martin Mitchell <gevans@mail.usyd.edu.au>]

Steve Greenland <stevegr@NeoSoft.COM> writes:

> Ditto. BTW, the answer is "post-interactive-configure",
> "pre-non-interactive-configure", which implies post ./configure for
> standard GNU type configure scripts.

I don't think this is correct. Often there are endianness checks in GNU
type configure scripts, and these checks need to be redone when building
on other architectures such as sparc and m68k. Most packages I've rebuilt
have had ./configure (where it exists) in the build target of debian/rules.

	Martin.


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org . 
Trouble?  e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .