Re: Architecture all
Christopher C Chimelis wrote:
> FYI, there is an official port of Quake to Linux-Alpha. The binaries are
> still for the glibc-1.99 snapshots (since it was compiled under RedHat),
> but it is in pretty wide use on the Alphas. To my knowledge, none of us
> involved in the Debian-Alpha "project" have tested the binaries under
> Debian and glibc-2.0.5c yet, but I'm sure it will come up sooner or later.
I've been meaning to get the alpha versions into the package at some point,
I just never got around to it. If you can dig up some alpha maintainer I can
throw test packages at, I'd love to try to get it working.
> Just figured I'd settle the "whether or not another architecture may need
> to be supported question"...guess they are :)
Well, I think there's still some question about the general secenerio, as
Package foo is i386 only
Package bar depends on package foo, but is arch: all
Should package bar be changed over to arch: i386?
Personally, I think not - package foo could always get a arch: all version
However, could it be a problem for users of some other architecture, who see
bar in dselect, try to select it, and get an unfullfilled dependancy on foo?
see shy jo
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
Trouble? e-mail to email@example.com .