Re: New ip-up (Was: Re: REQ ip-up: run-parts /etc/ppp/up ) (fwd)

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: New ip-up (Was: Re: REQ ip-up: run-parts /etc/ppp/up ) (fwd)
From: Guy Maor <maor@ece.utexas.edu>
Date: 17 Oct 1997 18:16:04 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] 87afg8htfv.fsf@dial-75-10.ots.utexas.edu>
In-reply-to: mbaker@iee.org's message of Fri, 17 Oct 1997 23:23:22 +0100
References: <199710171950.MAA21486@citytel1.citytel.net> <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.971017125840.557A-100000@citytelprct76.citytel.net> <[🔎] E0xMKni-0001MS-00@aziraphale.pet.cam.ac.uk>

mbaker@iee.org (Mark Baker) writes:

> Why?

His solution was for a dynamic IP.


Guy


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org . 
Trouble?  e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .

Reply to:

References:
- Re: New ip-up (Was: Re: REQ ip-up: run-parts /etc/ppp/up ) (fwd)
  - From: Manong Dibos <jwalther@citytel.net>
- Re: New ip-up (Was: Re: REQ ip-up: run-parts /etc/ppp/up ) (fwd)
  - From: mbaker@iee.org (Mark Baker)

Prev by Date: Re: No Debian/MIPS (was: More Linux/SGI status) (fwd)
Next by Date: Re: Future of Unix - comments please
Previous by thread: Re: New ip-up (Was: Re: REQ ip-up: run-parts /etc/ppp/up ) (fwd)
Next by thread: KDE needs qt1g!
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread