Re: Sendmail with deliver, procmail, or mailagent?
Scott Ellis <email@example.com> writes:
> netgod and I are concerned about the possiblity of adding an extra script
> between sendmail and procmail/deliver may introduce an additional point of
> failure and possible mail loss between sendmail and the MDA (when the
> process table is full for instance). But if all we need to worry about is
> procmail and deliver, it seems that making them aware of sendmail is good
How do you know it's *just* procmail and deliver? For that matter, if
qmail ever got packaged and wanted to use procmail and/or deliver for
local delivery, they'll need to be updated to check /etc/init.d/qmail
for how qmail is invoked.
I would note that the scripts might be better expressed as (for
exec /usr/bin/procmail -Y -a "$2" -d "$3"
Carey Evans <*> http://home.clear.net.nz/pages/c.evans/ gc
kernel: Warning: possible SYN flooding. Sending cookies.
kernel: validated probe(100007f, 100007f, 11557, 5010, -1645409555)
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
Trouble? e-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org .