Re: Bug#12506: #!/bin/bash - Solaris compatibility??

To: Debian Development <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: Bug#12506: #!/bin/bash - Solaris compatibility??
From: karlheg@inetarena.com (Karl M. Hegbloom)
Date: 11 Sep 1997 16:56:41 -0700
Message-id: <[🔎] 87u3frs8ue.fsf@bittersweet.inetarena.com>
In-reply-to: Christoph Lameter's message of "Fri, 5 Sep 1997 12:20:23 -0700 (PDT)"
References: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.970905121705.2136A-100000@waterf.org>

 I prefer `bash'.  Progress is more important than backassward
compadiblity.

 Did you know that `bash-2.0' can load .so files into new builtin
commands?  Seems like that might open some possiblities for hooks into
`deity' and other tools.


-- 
mailto:karlheg@inetarena.com (Karl M. Hegbloom)
http://www.inetarena.com/~karlheg
Portland, OR  USA
Debian GNU 1.3.1+hamm  Linux pre-2.0.31-9+select+QNX  AMD K5 PR-133


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org . 
Trouble?  e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Bug#12506: #!/bin/bash - Solaris compatibility??
  - From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@waterf.org>

Prev by Date: Linux Router Project - Initial beta release now available.
Next by Date: Re: Changes in source for different distributions
Previous by thread: Re: Bug#12506: #!/bin/bash - Solaris compatibility??
Next by thread: isnd eicon diva 2.0 pro
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread