Re: analog copyright question
- To: Christian Schwarz <email@example.com>
- Cc: Joey Hess <firstname.lastname@example.org>, email@example.com
- Subject: Re: analog copyright question
- From: Joey Hess <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Mon, 1 Sep 1997 12:45:56 -0400
- Message-id: <19970901124556.51751@kite>
- In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.3.96.970901112003.11877A-100000@monet>; from Christian Schwarz on Mon, Sep 01, 1997 at 11:23:32AM +0200
- References: <19970831194024.36360@kite> <Pine.LNX.3.96.970901112003.11877A-100000@monet>
Christian Schwarz wrote:
> > 3) The program may be copied and distributed by any person or organisation in
> > any way whatsoever, provided that any distribution is accompanied by a copy
> > of the Readme file pertaining to the program. You may not charge for
> > distributing the program without first informing the person to whom it is
> > distributed that analog is free software.
> We do not state that _analog_ is free software. (Take me as an example: I
> sell Debian CDs with analog, but I don't have a note on my web page
> stating that analog is `free'.)
We state that all of debian in the main dist is free software. That does
imply that analog is free. But is that good enough?
see shy jo
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
Trouble? e-mail to email@example.com .