Re: I2O article

To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@gpu.srv.ualberta.ca>
Cc: Bruce Perens <bruce@debian.org>, Debian Developers <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: I2O article
From: Mark Eichin <eichin@cygnus.com>
Date: 27 Aug 1997 16:39:22 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] xe1iuwr2wed.fsf@maneki-neko.cygnus.com>
In-reply-to: Jason Gunthorpe's message of "Tue, 26 Aug 1997 19:15:24 -0600 (MDT)"
References: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.970826191248.394A-100000@Wakko.ualberta.ca>

> Anyhow, since they are supposed to run VxWorks on the i960 it may prove
> very hard to reverse engineer the executable format, kernel interface,

HUH? VxWorks for the I960 has been supported by gcc/binutils for
*years*... Intel funded the original port.  There are problems in I2O,
and OHI sounds like a "good place to stand" to fight them, but these
aren't it.


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org . 
Trouble?  e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: I2O article
  - From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@gpu.srv.ualberta.ca>

References:
- Re: I2O article
  - From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@gpu.srv.ualberta.ca>

Prev by Date: Re: Lists of Maintainers
Next by Date: Re: Lists of Maintainers
Previous by thread: Re: I2O article
Next by thread: Re: I2O article
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread