Re: Way to switch easily (Was: Re: Egcs, gcc, and Debian)
On Tue, 19 Aug 1997, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
> Having a link from stdcc to gcc or egcc or whatever cc one uses would be
> an option, but having a link called gcc that doesn't point to gcc isn't
> a good thing. Some programms expect gcc when they call gcc and they are
> totally right to assume that they will get gcc when they call it.
True. I never thought people would read it this way. I mean for the
symlink to be to cc.... not gcc.
Hope this clears things up.
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
Trouble? e-mail to email@example.com .