Re: egcs (New GCC)
On Sun, 17 Aug 1997, Vincent Renardias wrote:
> > BTW, I think FSF is mostly justified in not releasing, gcc is so important
> > to alot of people that a flawed release could be really bad for them.
> Ok, so we should keep gcc because we want Debian's compiler to be stable
> enough? (By "stable enough", I mean "able to compile properly the ~600 MB
> of Debian's source code")
> We probably want to package both... _(;
Yeah, one bug in egcs could be bad news for us, it would be important to
be able to fall back to gcc 2.7 for some packages. It would be -really-
nice to be able to use the alternates mechanism to select the default
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
Trouble? e-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org .