Re: egcs (New GCC)
On Sun, 17 Aug 1997, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> If egcs makes their start of september release I suggest that we dump 2.7
> and move to 2.90 (what they are numbering their release).
Ok, so we dump gcc, and package egcs instead...
> BTW, I think FSF is mostly justified in not releasing, gcc is so important
> to alot of people that a flawed release could be really bad for them.
Ok, so we should keep gcc because we want Debian's compiler to be stable
enough? (By "stable enough", I mean "able to compile properly the ~600 MB
of Debian's source code")
We probably want to package both... _(;
--
- ** Linux ** +-------------------+ ** WAW ** -
- vincent@debian.org | RENARDIAS Vincent | vincent@waw.com -
- Debian/GNU Linux +-------------------+ http://www.waw.com/ -
- http://www.debian.org/ | WAW (33) 4 91 81 21 45 -
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: