Re: non-debian kernels -- bizzar?
On Mon, 28 Jul 1997 14:48:18 +0200 joost witteveen
(joost@rulcmc.leidenuniv.nl) wrote:
> I would like to have opinions about this from others.
[snip]
> Does anyone else think it should be possible to remove the current
> running kernel, if you answer "yes" to an explicit question that
> informs you about the possible dangers? Or, do I simply have to
> reboot into kernel 2.0.29 (also still on my HD), then remove
> the debian kernel package-2.0.30, and reboot into my own 2.0.30
> again? Really, I don't see why I should have to go through all
> this trouble, or what benefit there is in making users go through
> all this. (Yes, I know I can also change the "exit 1" to an "exit 0"
> in the prerm, but the example above is just to show how easy it is
> go get around the test without really knowing what you do).
I second this.
I always get rid of the kernel package (by removing the prerm first, then dpkg --purge).
Phil.
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: