Re: non-debian kernels -- bizzar?
> Does anyone else think it should be possible to remove the current
> running kernel, if you answer "yes" to an explicit question that
> informs you about the possible dangers? Or, do I simply have to
> reboot into kernel 2.0.29 (also still on my HD), then remove
> the debian kernel package-2.0.30, and reboot into my own 2.0.30
> again? Really, I don't see why I should have to go through all
> this trouble, or what benefit there is in making users go through
> all this. (Yes, I know I can also change the "exit 1" to an "exit 0"
> in the prerm, but the example above is just to show how easy it is
> go get around the test without really knowing what you do).
>
I agree. The only thing is that prerm should give a prominent warning
that user has to make sure there is a replacement kernel before
next reboot.
Alex Y.
>
> Yes, I know I can also build my own kernel with the debian-kernel
> package, but why do I have to?
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> --
> joost witteveen, joostje@debian.org
> #!/usr/bin/perl -sp0777i<X+d*lMLa^*lN%0]dsXx++lMlN/dsM0<j]dsj
> $/=unpack('H*',$_);$_=`echo 16dio\U$k"SK$/SM$n\EsN0p[lN*1
> lK[d2%Sa2/d0$^Ixp"|dc`;s/\W//g;$_=pack('H*',/((..)*)$/)
> #what's this? see http://www.dcs.ex.ac.uk/~aba/rsa/
>
>
> --
> TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
> debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org .
> Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
>
>
>
--
_
_( )_
( (o___ +-------------------------------------------+
| _ 7 | Alexander Yukhimets |
\ (") | http://pages.nyu.edu/~aqy6633/ |
/ \ \ +-------------------------------------------+
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: