Re: source dependencies

[Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@datasync.com>]

Hi,
>>"Andreas" == Andreas Jellinghaus <aj@dungeon.inka.de> writes:

Andreas> On Jul 22, Santiago Vila Doncel wrote
>> Agreed that we should start with creating a list...
>> 
>> ( I don't have "kernel-headers" installed :-)

Andreas> first try :

Andreas> the tools: bash bin86 binutils bison cpp debmake diff dpkg
Andreas> dpkg-dev fakeroot file fileutils findutils flex gcc grep gzip
Andreas> kernel-headers ldso libc6 make mawk ncurses3.4 patch perl sed
Andreas> shellutils tar textutils update util-linux

	forget kernel-headers. No package should need them, the one
 that does (pcmcia-modules) can add an explicit dependency. Send me
 email if you want the FAQ detailing why this is so (the one that
 quotes Linus).

	manoj
-- 
 HOW TO PROVE IT, PART 1 proof by example: The author gives only the
 case n = 2 and suggests that it contains most of the ideas of the
 general proof.  proof by intimidation: 'Trivial'.  proof by vigorous
 handwaving: Works well in a classroom or seminar setting.
Manoj Srivastava               <url:mailto:srivasta@acm.org>
Mobile, Alabama USA            <url:http://www.datasync.com/%7Esrivasta/>


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org . 
Trouble?  e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .