RE: fwtk should be removed IMO
It's out of question that the software is very useful. I do use it
myself (the 2.0 version that is). But we must not distribute that
version at all. I wonder if it's a good idea to distribute the old
version. I'd rather have an install package for fwtk (as we have to
netscape) that creates a local 2.0 package if you have the sources.
Michael
--
Dr. Michael Meskes, Project-Manager | topsystem Systemhaus GmbH
meskes@topsystem.de | Europark A2, Adenauerstr. 20
meskes@debian.org | 52146 Wuerselen
Go SF49ers! Go Rhein Fire! | Tel: (+49) 2405/4670-44
Use Debian GNU/Linux! | Fax: (+49) 2405/4670-10
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Jason Gunthorpe [SMTP:jgg@gpu.srv.ualberta.ca]
>Sent: Friday, June 27, 1997 2:47 AM
>To: Michael Meskes
>Cc: Die Adresse des Empfängers ist unbekannt.
>Subject: Re: fwtk should be removed IMO
>
>
>
>On Wed, 25 Jun 1997, Michael Meskes wrote:
>
>> We still distribute version 1.3 which is outdated. The actual version is
>> 2.0. I tried contacting TIS and got this replay:
>>
>> ...
>> In summary, you cannot:
>> * give the software to anyone, period
>> * put a copy of the software on an ftp site (i.e. mirror)
>> * distribute it in any form
>>
>> I think we should remove fwtk completely.
>
>Please don't, it still has a very usefull FTP and Telnet proxy. Plug-GW is
>also handy at times.
>
>Jason
>
>
>--
>TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
>debian-private-request@lists.debian.org .
>Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
>
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: