RE: fwtk should be removed IMO
It's out of question that the software is very useful. I do use it
myself (the 2.0 version that is). But we must not distribute that
version at all. I wonder if it's a good idea to distribute the old
version. I'd rather have an install package for fwtk (as we have to
netscape) that creates a local 2.0 package if you have the sources.
Dr. Michael Meskes, Project-Manager | topsystem Systemhaus GmbH
email@example.com | Europark A2, Adenauerstr. 20
firstname.lastname@example.org | 52146 Wuerselen
Go SF49ers! Go Rhein Fire! | Tel: (+49) 2405/4670-44
Use Debian GNU/Linux! | Fax: (+49) 2405/4670-10
>From: Jason Gunthorpe [SMTP:email@example.com]
>Sent: Friday, June 27, 1997 2:47 AM
>To: Michael Meskes
>Cc: Die Adresse des Empfängers ist unbekannt.
>Subject: Re: fwtk should be removed IMO
>On Wed, 25 Jun 1997, Michael Meskes wrote:
>> We still distribute version 1.3 which is outdated. The actual version is
>> 2.0. I tried contacting TIS and got this replay:
>> In summary, you cannot:
>> * give the software to anyone, period
>> * put a copy of the software on an ftp site (i.e. mirror)
>> * distribute it in any form
>> I think we should remove fwtk completely.
>Please don't, it still has a very usefull FTP and Telnet proxy. Plug-GW is
>also handy at times.
>TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
>Trouble? e-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org .
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
Trouble? e-mail to email@example.com .