RE: fwtk should be removed IMO
On Fri, 27 Jun 1997, Michael Meskes wrote:
> It's out of question that the software is very useful. I do use it
> myself (the 2.0 version that is). But we must not distribute that
> version at all. I wonder if it's a good idea to distribute the old
> version. I'd rather have an install package for fwtk (as we have to
> netscape) that creates a local 2.0 package if you have the sources.
Doesn't FreeBSD have something like this, where you can download the
pristine sources, and they provide a patch file, and you just run make,
and you get a working version. This type of thing, would probably good
for debian to have too, not just for the fwtk.
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
Trouble? e-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org .