RE: fwtk should be removed IMO
Didn't we have something like that for the compress package?
Dr. Michael Meskes, Project-Manager | topsystem Systemhaus GmbH
email@example.com | Europark A2, Adenauerstr. 20
firstname.lastname@example.org | 52146 Wuerselen
Go SF49ers! Go Rhein Fire! | Tel: (+49) 2405/4670-44
Use Debian GNU/Linux! | Fax: (+49) 2405/4670-10
>From: Shaya Potter [SMTP:email@example.com]
>Sent: Friday, June 27, 1997 3:58 PM
>To: Michael Meskes
>Cc: 'Jason Gunthorpe'; 'firstname.lastname@example.org'
>Subject: RE: fwtk should be removed IMO
>On Fri, 27 Jun 1997, Michael Meskes wrote:
>> It's out of question that the software is very useful. I do use it
>> myself (the 2.0 version that is). But we must not distribute that
>> version at all. I wonder if it's a good idea to distribute the old
>> version. I'd rather have an install package for fwtk (as we have to
>> netscape) that creates a local 2.0 package if you have the sources.
>Doesn't FreeBSD have something like this, where you can download the
>pristine sources, and they provide a patch file, and you just run make,
>and you get a working version. This type of thing, would probably good
>for debian to have too, not just for the fwtk.
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
Trouble? e-mail to email@example.com .