Re: Hamm: Exim + Chos standard?
I dont know if I already said this but exim does not support bangpaths but
domainized uucp is no problem.
On 14 Jun 1997, John Goerzen wrote:
>Christoph Lameter <email@example.com> writes:
>> It might be good if we would replace smail in hamm with exim. Exim should
>> be the standard mailer for hamm:
>Exim doesn't provide UUCP capabilities *at all*, thus it is rather
>useless for sites that use UUCP (like me). Right now, I am using
>sendmail. (What, BTW, is the reason for not using sendmail?)
>John Goerzen | Running Debian GNU/Linux (www.debian.org)
>Custom Programming |
--- +++ --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ ---
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
firstname.lastname@example.org . Trouble?
e-mail to email@example.com .