Re: When will bash 2.01 be packaged?
firstname.lastname@example.org (Mark Baker) writes:
> > Guy Maor is the current maintainer of the "bash" package. However,
> > he told us that he is offline for about 4 weeks. So I think
> > someone else should grab it and upload a non-maintainer (interim)
> > release.
> Is that necessary just to work round a (long standing) bug in
> another program?
I don't care in the least about netrape, but one good reason for doing
a non-maintainer release of bash would be to build it against glibc.
I'm sure I'm not the only one who needs a libc6-based libreadline for
some of my packages.
Also, I'd imagine there were other bugs fixed in 2.01.
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
Trouble? e-mail to email@example.com .