On Jun 12, Kai Henningsen wrote > phil@fifi.org (Philippe Troin) wrote on 12.06.97 in <[🔎] 199706121732.KAA31530@tantale.fifi.org>: > > > I'm stuck with the diald package, and I've got problems with users > > from old versions. The thing is: > > the files /etc/diald/diald.ip-{up,down} weren't conffiles, and now > > they are. > > Installing a new version of diald where the ip-up/down scripts are > > conffiles on top of an old version where they weren't results in > > overwriting of the files. > > I'd like to call that a dpkg bug. When a file is a conffile in either the > new or the old package, dpkg ought to use conffile behaviour. Anything > else is just too dangerous. > I don't know about the "conffile only in older package" situation, but it seems like a good idea for the "conffile only in newer package" situation. Christian
Attachment:
pgpg1cKRA8TYs.pgp
Description: PGP signature