Re: cygwin.dll license (was Re: FreeQt ?)
Well, maybe the GPL is broken when it comes to situations like this. What
I don't understand is, if something doesn't contain any GPL'd code, how
can the GPL force me to put my product under it. So it has the interface
calls to library/.dll, copyrights don't cover how something works,
patents do. The GPL isn't a patent, so therefore only covers protecting
the product from being reused. Well if my product doesn't explicitly use
it, it shouldn't have to be under the GPL.
Just my 2 cents
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
Trouble? e-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org .