Re: policy about putting packages into frozen ?
Quoting Andreas Jellinghaus (aj@dungeon.inka.de):
> my problem is the isdn package : the new version was released (beta1)
> this week, and it was tested a long time (public cvs tree). now it has a
> documentation (not all binaries but at least some), some new features
> and a lot of bugs fixed. the old release is nearly unusable (the kernel
> driver was fixes in 2.0.29 and again in 2.0.30, the old isdn utils won't
> run with the new device driver, but using old kernels isn't a good thing
> in this case.)
>
> so : am i allowed to upload the package into frozen (i will build it
> these day, upload it into unstable, and beg some isdn users to test it).
> if there are no major problems, it should go into frozen (the old
> package is nearly unusable and buggy).
The old (well, latest) isdnutils package got some real problems, I'd like to
sign that.
Since I'm also following the isdn4linux development quite closely I can only
say that Andreas is right, there were many bugfixes and isdnutils needs an
update. It can hardly be less working, only better, see?
Alexander
--
Ich hatte einen schoenen Nachmittag, war Wellenreiten ;-} Im Wellenbad!
Endlich mal wieder sauber! *freu* *glaenz* -- (c) Michael 'Wimbaer' Thies
Alexander Koch - <>< - aka efraim - +49-(0)89-64289385
Gruenwalder Strasse 70 - D-81547 Munich - Germany - Europe
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: