Re: Make bug package required? (was Re: berolist.deb)
Christoph> How could that ever be checked?
It cannot, and that's why bug(1) should not include files automatically.
Christoph> Bug used to have (I am not the maintainer anymore...) a check so
Christoph> that it cannot be run as root and does not read files as root.
Sorry, but you are at least two feet besides the point. If I put a password
into a config file, that file will be in, say, mode 0600. So when I then
report a bug, I can read that file containing the password. So bug(1) can
read the file, and will blindly include the content.
Christoph> Contents of config files are important for the maintainer of
Christoph> the package.
If needed, private mail suffices quite well for that purpose.
Christoph> Cannot see a good reason why this is a "bug"...
Just try to figure out the stink someone would make on a linux newsgroup:
Friggin' Debian system posted my password to the world...
The bug in bug(1) is caused by the absence of common sense in (your) design
of the very program.
Dirk Eddelbuettel email@example.com firstname.lastname@example.org
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
Trouble? e-mail to email@example.com .