Re: Make bug package required? (was Re: berolist.deb)
How could that ever be checked? Bug used to have (I am not the maintainer
anymore...) a check so that it cannot be run as root and does not read
files as root. Contents of config files are important for the maintainer
of the package.
The configfiles are displayed when the message is written. The bug
reporter can review the information before it is submitted.
Cannot see a good reason why this is a "bug"...
On Sat, 10 May 1997, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> Christoph> Could we make the "bug" package either required or standard so
> Christoph> that it is installed by default?
>Only if the _very_ dangerous bug #9367 is fixed. 
> Someone reported a bug against a dial-in program and thereby revealed
> his password as bug includes the config files with no warning whatsoever.
> And no check for content.
> Dirk Eddelbuettel email@example.com firstname.lastname@example.org
--- +++ --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ ---
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
Trouble? e-mail to email@example.com .