Re: "dselect" replacement team
Jason Gunthorpe <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> Tell me, what was the reason that the Alpha port didn't have a working
Linus' decision to support ECOFF, since the ELF64 standard didn't
exist at the time. gcc wasn't able to cope.
> > This is a mistaken assumption, and since you're talking about the most
> > low-level tool in the debian arsenal, this is a big issue. C++ would
> > be a mistake.
> You do know that dselect is already in C++, right? Since this is a dselect
> replacment project I wonder if that's really an issue?
Then why do I keep hearing stuff about rewriting dpkg?