Re: FSSTND Questions regarding /usr/{,local}/{share,libexec}/ ?

To: "Brian C. White" <bcwhite@verisim.com>
Cc: Christian Schwarz <schwarz@monet.m.isar.de>, Daniel Quinlan <quinlan@transmeta.com>, Debian Developer <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: FSSTND Questions regarding /usr/{,local}/{share,libexec}/ ?
From: Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd@rosebud.sps.queensu.ca>
Date: Sat, 5 Apr 1997 17:01:00 -0500 (EST)
Message-id: <[🔎] m0wDdWS-0000YLC@miles.econ.queensu.ca>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 3346B3FC.4038A85F@verisim.com>
References: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.970405004002.2095A-100000@klee> <[🔎] 3346B3FC.4038A85F@verisim.com>

  Christian> We'll have to get out 1.3 first before changing our policy!

  Brian>  Absolutely.

Just for the record: I never said we should. I was just asking for comments
regarding the layout of the octave package.

If I make another release of it before 1.3 (which is quite possible), I'll
roll /usr/libexec back to /usr/lib, but I'll keep /usr/share and
/usr/local/share as the comments were supportive.

Otherwise, adopting the FHS with the next set of policy rules for the next
release seems like a Good Thing.

--
 Dirk Eddelb"uttel    edd@poboxes.com    http://www.netforward.com/poboxes/?edd

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: FSSTND Questions regarding /usr/{,local}/{share,libexec}/ ?
  - From: Fabrizio Polacco <fpolacco@icenet.fi>

References:
- Re: FSSTND Questions regarding /usr/{,local}/{share,libexec}/ ?
  - From: Christian Schwarz <schwarz@monet.m.isar.de>
- Re: FSSTND Questions regarding /usr/{,local}/{share,libexec}/ ?
  - From: "Brian C. White" <bcwhite@verisim.com>

Prev by Date: "dselect" replacement team
Next by Date: Re: No answer from 'new-maintainer' ?
Previous by thread: Re: FSSTND Questions regarding /usr/{,local}/{share,libexec}/ ?
Next by thread: Re: FSSTND Questions regarding /usr/{,local}/{share,libexec}/ ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread