Re: some netstd changes ...
'Peter Tobias wrote:'
>
>I'll upload a new netstd package soon. If there are no objections I'll
>also do the following changes:
>
>- remove pop2d (do we need a pop-2 daemon?)
OK.
>- remove pop3d (we already have 2 better pop3 daemons)
I use this and would not like to see it broken on those systems that
haven't upgraded to qpopper yet. In principle, I think it's a good
idea (a smaller netstd). However, if the security bug fix requires
that this goes into rex, I think the change should wait for a bo only
release.
--
Christopher J. Fearnley | Linux/Internet Consulting
cjf@netaxs.com, cjf@onit.net | UNIX SIG Leader at PACS
http://www.netaxs.com/~cjf | (Philadelphia Area Computer Society)
ftp://ftp.netaxs.com/people/cjf | Design Science Revolutionary
"Dare to be Naive" -- Bucky Fuller | Explorer in Universe
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org . Trouble? e-mail to Bruce@Pixar.com
Reply to: