Re: Miniscule Bug in ld.so Deb1.2: /usr/local/lib

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Miniscule Bug in ld.so Deb1.2: /usr/local/lib
From: Guy Maor <maor@ece.utexas.edu>
Date: 29 Dec 1996 23:03:49 -0600
Message-id: <[🔎] 87bubchbd6.fsf@slip-60-2.ots.utexas.edu>
In-reply-to: david@elo.sw.ods.com's message of Sun, 29 Dec 1996 21:30:46 -0600 (CST)
References: <[🔎] m0veYR4-000188C@elo.sw.ods.com>

david@elo.sw.ods.com (David Engel) writes:

> Either
> /usr/local/lib should be removed from the default ld.so.conf in the
> ldso package or the directory should be added back in the base-files
> package.  Comments?

The FSSTND allows certain empty directories to be in /usr/local in
4.7, presumably as a guide to the local administrator.  base-files
should include them.


Guy


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org . Trouble? e-mail to Bruce@Pixar.com

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Miniscule Bug in ld.so Deb1.2: /usr/local/lib
  - From: david@elo.sw.ods.com (David Engel)

Prev by Date: Re: Ordering package install (was: Problem to upgrade (perl). (fwd))
Next by Date: Re: how do I compile without statically linked libraries?
Previous by thread: Re: Miniscule Bug in ld.so Deb1.2: /usr/local/lib
Next by thread: porting dpkg to solaris
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread