1.2 boot floppy
I'm building yet another kernel for 1.2 right now. The boot floppies should
be uploaded before noon Wednesday. Unfortunately, dpkg-ftp and co. did not
fit in the 3-floppy install set. I had originally thought that I could get
PGP and some net stuff in there, but other things became larger.
Bruce
--
Bruce Perens K6BP Bruce@Pixar.com
Finger Bruce@master.Debian.org for PGP public key.
PGP fingerprint = 88 6A 15 D0 65 D4 A3 A6 1F 89 6A 76 95 24 87 B3
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org . Trouble? e-mail to Bruce@Pixar.com
>From miss
Received: from mongo.pixar.com (138.72.50.60)
by master.debian.org with SMTP; 27 Nov 1996 08:54:07 -0000
Received: (qmail 22972 invoked from network); 27 Nov 1996 08:39:06 -0000
Received: from primer.i-connect.net (HELO master.debian.org) (bruce@206.139.73.13)
by mongo.pixar.com with SMTP; 27 Nov 1996 08:38:54 -0000
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 1996 09:38:06 +0100 (MET)
From: Juergen Menden <menden@informatik.tu-muenchen.de>
To: Debian development <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: depends for *exact* upstream matches?
In-Reply-To: <xe1afs4msuf.fsf@maneki-neko.cygnus.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.3.95.961127093455.15862A-100000@koma.informatik.tu-muenchen.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Resent-Message-ID: <"cgy-_2.0.JK2.T60do"@master.debian.org>
Resent-From: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Resent-Reply-To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
X-Mailing-List: <debian-devel@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/366
X-Loop: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Precedence: list
Priority: non-urgent
Importance: low
Resent-Sender: debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
On 26 Nov 1996, Mark Eichin wrote:
>
> The real question, though: is
> Depends: gcc (>= 2.7.2.1), gcc (<< 2.7.2.2)
> a correct way to indicate that I want exactly 2.7.2.1 upstream
> release, but I don't care what debian revision?
seem's so (see other comments). but why do you expect that future
upstream versions of gcc break existing code for ada support?
jjm
--
Juergen Menden | Disclaimer: The opinions expressed by me,
tel: +49 (89) 289 - 22387 +-----------+ are (usually) not the opinions
e-mail: menden@informatik.tu-muenchen.de | of anyone else on this planet.
Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Add me to your .signature and join in the fun!
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org . Trouble? e-mail to Bruce@Pixar.com
>From miss
Received: from mongo.pixar.com (138.72.50.60)
by master.debian.org with SMTP; 27 Nov 1996 09:09:31 -0000
Received: (qmail 24581 invoked from network); 27 Nov 1996 08:54:31 -0000
Received: from primer.i-connect.net (HELO master.debian.org) (bruce@206.139.73.13)
by mongo.pixar.com with SMTP; 27 Nov 1996 08:54:14 -0000
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 1996 09:52:09 +0100 (MET)
From: Juergen Menden <menden@informatik.tu-muenchen.de>
To: Debian development <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
Subject: unstable nameing discussion
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.3.95.961127093953.15862B-100000@koma.informatik.tu-muenchen.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Resent-Message-ID: <"kthOb2.0.pP2.rK0do"@master.debian.org>
Resent-From: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Resent-Reply-To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
X-Mailing-List: <debian-devel@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/367
X-Loop: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Precedence: list
Priority: non-urgent
Importance: low
Resent-Sender: debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
the discussion about a rename of unstable is now going on for
at least 9 months. the first thread i know of was started because
we wanted to make clear that this distribution should not be used
by the unwary and especially not appear on a CD. another early
thread was started because of problems the mirrors have when
releasing a distribution, which resulted in the introduction of
code-names. i can not see any really pressing problems now.
what i propose therefore is to stop the discussion about this issue
for at least until summer (july?) next year to collect any experience
(good and bad) with the current archive organisation and reevaluate
and discuss the organisation then.
a neverending discussion, possible resulting in endless changes doesn't
increase the reliability of the project in the eyes of the outside
world.
jjm
ps: 'why is unstable named unstable?' might be a good faq nowadays,
isn't it? :-))
--
Juergen Menden | Disclaimer: The opinions expressed by me,
tel: +49 (89) 289 - 22387 +-----------+ are (usually) not the opinions
e-mail: menden@informatik.tu-muenchen.de | of anyone else on this planet.
Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Add me to your .signature and join in the fun!
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org . Trouble? e-mail to Bruce@Pixar.com
Reply to: