Re: Problems with dependencies
>> If not, a better idea is if each etags binary were renamed to
>> <package>etags, and then etags was handled as an alternative? I think
>> I prefer this actually. Opinions?
In fact, I believe elvis is doing the right thing here, I've just been
lame in putting the equivalent hooks in the emacs distribution. Maybe
this weekend (even if 19.35 is just around the corner :-)
emacs/xemacs have a few other conflicts (client, movemail) that need
the same treatement.
--
This message was distributed manually by Bruce@debian.org after the list
initially failed to distribute it.
Reply to: