Re: Problems with dependencies
On 13 Nov 1996, Guy Maor wrote:
> It would be fine if every package were to suggest its own
> corresponding etags, but I understand they're all fairly compatible.
> If not, a better idea is if each etags binary were renamed to
> <package>etags, and then etags was handled as an alternative? I think
> I prefer this actually. Opinions?
Good idea. I'll vote for "alternatives" too.
-- _,, Christian Schwarz
/ o \__ email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org,
! ___; email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org
\\\______/ ! PGP-fp: 8F 61 EB 6D CF 23 CA D7 34 05 14 5C C8 DC 22 BA
\ / http://fatman.mathematik.tu-muenchen.de/~schwarz/
"DIE ENTE BLEIBT DRAUSSEN!"
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org . Trouble? e-mail to Bruce@Pixar.com