[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Problems with dependencies

On 13 Nov 1996, Guy Maor wrote:

> It would be fine if every package were to suggest its own
> corresponding etags, but I understand they're all fairly compatible.
> If not, a better idea is if each etags binary were renamed to
> <package>etags, and then etags was handled as an alternative?  I think
> I prefer this actually.  Opinions?

Good idea. I'll vote for "alternatives" too.


--          _,,     Christian Schwarz
           / o \__   schwarz@monet.m.isar.de, schwarz@debian.org,
           !   ___;   schwarz@mathematik.tu-muenchen.de, bm955877@muenchen.org
           \  /        
  \\\______/  !        PGP-fp: 8F 61 EB 6D CF 23 CA D7  34 05 14 5C C8 DC 22 BA
   \          /         http://fatman.mathematik.tu-muenchen.de/~schwarz/

TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org . Trouble? e-mail to Bruce@Pixar.com

Reply to: