Re: Debmake updated and ideas regarding dpkg
On Tue, 22 Oct 1996, Giuliano Procida wrote:
gpp10 >> Gosh, I'm not sure. Maybe it was a dream. But I vaguely remember a
gpp10 >> distinction between .so statements and links being made somewhere. I
gpp10 >> did a few tests yet nothing jogged my memory :( If no one else
gpp10 >> remembers, then I should be ignored!
gpp10 >
gpp10 >Perhaps problems arise when symlinks point to manpages, and then the
gpp10 >manpage is compressed/decompressed, breaking the symlink. If the .so
gpp10 >statements cope nicely irrespective of compression, then it would be
gpp10 >better to use them instead.
Debmake checks all symlinks and fixes them if they point to nothing as a
result of compression of documentation.
{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}
{} Consulting available for Networking / Unix / Crossplatform integration {}
{} Snail Mail: FTS Box 466, 135 N.Oakland Ave, Pasadena, CA 91182 {}
{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}
PGP Public Key = FB 9B 31 21 04 1E 3A 33 C7 62 2F C0 CD 81 CA B5
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org . Trouble? e-mail to Bruce@Pixar.com
Reply to: