[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Inclusion of kernel version in kernel package names: A followup

AAAAAAAUGH.  Please, guys, have a look at the new packaging scripts,
either in the 1.3.95+ packages or in the standalone package being
distributed right now.

	It allows both prepackaged and user custom packages to
 co-exist. Really. (At the moment you may have problems removing the
 old image package, but I'm working on that, right now you have to say
 --force-remove-essential till I remove the essential flag. 

	Co-existance can, and has, been achieved, even for loadlin
 users (as long as you do not install version X.X.XX on top of a
 existing X.X.XX version). 

	With the new kernel-package package being released, you may
 even create your own debianized kernels (that's what I do).  Could we
 give this thread a rest, please, unless you see a problem with the
 new scripts (1.3.64 has the older scripts that have problems)?

"Standards committees are not the best ways to create a standard.
Standards meetings and standards themselves are horribly political
things.  One thing that people forget is that many standards are made
by rather small groups of people.  A few good people can really save
the day, and a few idiots can really make it miserable for years to
come."  -- Dennis Ritchie, coinventor of Unix %%
Manoj Srivastava               Systems Research Programmer, Project Pilgrim,
Phone: (413) 545-3918                A143B Lederle Graduate Research Center,
Fax:   (413) 545-1249         University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003
<srivasta@pilgrim.umass.edu> <URL:http://www.pilgrim.umass.edu/%7Esrivasta/>

Reply to: