Re: Bug#2697: symlink /usr/include/asm in libc5-dev
osiris@cs.utexas.edu (Rob Browning) wrote on 19.04.96 in <[🔎] 199604191654.LAA10202@janus.csres.utexas.edu>:
> >>>>> "D" == David Engel <david@elo.ods.com> writes:
D>> The former, but it's worse than that. Source packages that
D>> compiled fine on a user's machine one day won't compile the next
D>> day on the very same user's machine.
> Yes, but the user *knows* that they upgraded the kernel and kernel
... _if_ this is a single user machine. Not all such systems are.
> But still, I think you're right. Having the headers in the libc5-dev
As this came up, I was somewhat disturbed by the decidedly untraditional
take on this - but after all the explanations, I'm forced to agree.
MfG Kai
Reply to: