[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: why doesn't binutils-2.6-1 provide a shared library?



david@elo.ods.com (David Engel), in a magnificent manifestation of deity, wrote:
>It could.  There is already some support for it in the Makefiles.  I
>chose to leave it for the eventual maintainer to add since it has
>packaging and support ramifications.  BTW, I did the same for libg++.

Who's going to be the maintainer?  I'd want to talk with them some about
it.

>The -D option is now needed to list the dynamic symbols in a shared
>library that can not be stripped.  You'll have to ask the binutils
>developers why they did this.

Ick.  Would that be of the GNU package or of the linux shared library
specs (gcc folks).

Darren
<torin@daft.com> <http://www.daft.com/~torin/>    <tnd@iswp.org> <torin@io.com>
Darren Stalder/2608 Second Ave, @282/Seattle, WA 98121-1212/USA/+1-800-921-4996
@ Do you have your clothes on? I probably don't. Take yours off. Feel better. @
@ Sysadmin, webweaver, postmaster for hire.  C and Perl programmer and tutor. @


Reply to: