Re: why doesn't binutils-2.6-1 provide a shared library?
david@elo.ods.com (David Engel), in a magnificent manifestation of deity, wrote:
>It could. There is already some support for it in the Makefiles. I
>chose to leave it for the eventual maintainer to add since it has
>packaging and support ramifications. BTW, I did the same for libg++.
Who's going to be the maintainer? I'd want to talk with them some about
it.
>The -D option is now needed to list the dynamic symbols in a shared
>library that can not be stripped. You'll have to ask the binutils
>developers why they did this.
Ick. Would that be of the GNU package or of the linux shared library
specs (gcc folks).
Darren
<torin@daft.com> <http://www.daft.com/~torin/> <tnd@iswp.org> <torin@io.com>
Darren Stalder/2608 Second Ave, @282/Seattle, WA 98121-1212/USA/+1-800-921-4996
@ Do you have your clothes on? I probably don't. Take yours off. Feel better. @
@ Sysadmin, webweaver, postmaster for hire. C and Perl programmer and tutor. @
Reply to: