Re: why doesn't binutils-2.6-1 provide a shared library?
> >It could. There is already some support for it in the Makefiles. I
> >chose to leave it for the eventual maintainer to add since it has
> >packaging and support ramifications. BTW, I did the same for libg++.
>
> Who's going to be the maintainer? I'd want to talk with them some about
> it.
Siggy Brentrup (bsb@uni-muenster.de) has volunteered, but the last I
heard, he was still having network problems.
> >The -D option is now needed to list the dynamic symbols in a shared
> >library that can not be stripped. You'll have to ask the binutils
> >developers why they did this.
>
> Ick. Would that be of the GNU package or of the linux shared library
> specs (gcc folks).
The GNU folks.
David
--
David Engel Optical Data Systems, Inc.
david@ods.com 1101 E. Arapaho Road
(214) 234-6400 Richardson, TX 75081
Reply to: