[email@example.com: Package construction Guidelines]
I converted the Guidelines to Texinfo and did some work on them, but they
never got to a point that I released them. When Bruce Perens assumed
control of the base system, I gave him control of the Guidelines, too.
I think Bruce has his hands full with the base system. Is anyone
interested in assuming the responsibility of updating and maintaining
the Guidelines? If so, please contact Bruce Perens, "firstname.lastname@example.org".
------- Start of forwarded message -------
Date: Sat, 12 Aug 95 16:53 BST
From: Ian Jackson <email@example.com>
To: Debian developers list <debian-devel@Pixar.com>
Subject: Package construction Guidelines
It seems to me that these are now very seriously out of date.
Is anyone working on a revision ?
Amongst the issues that need to be addressed are:
- start-stop-daemon, init.d, rc.d, rc.misc, update-rc.d [+]
- extended descriptions
- logfile rotation [+]
- release announcements
- dpkg-handled versus postinst-handled and frequently-modified
configuration files [+]
- HTML descriptions [*] [+]
- X library handling [+]
- robustness and error checking in maintainer scripts.
- competing-package solutions (vi, &c) [*] [+]
- Various things to do with dpkg's maintainer scripts (some [+])
- The Source field.
- Virtual packages, including procedure for allocating virtual
package names and for double-checking control files [*],
and providing good defaults by naming packages explicitly [+].
[*] These things are still under discussion.
[+] These things are applicable only to certain packages, and are
perhaps best dealt with in appendices written by relevant package
maintainers, with a strong requirement in the Guidelines proper to
read appropriate appendices.
------- End of forwarded message -------