Re: Building postgres requires bmake. Should it be a seperate package?

To: debian-devel@Pixar.com
Subject: Re: Building postgres requires bmake. Should it be a seperate package?
From: "Guy R. Thomas" <gthomas@native-ed.bc.ca>
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 95 11:39:10 -0700
Message-id: <[🔎] 9508251839.AA29487@native-ed.bc.ca>
References: <[🔎] 9508251807.AA00720@bb29c.mdd.comm.mot.com>

Ian Murdock <imurdock@debian.org> mentioned that pmake might be the same  
as bmake.  It looks like they are close enough, if not exactly equal, so  
case closed on the bmake issue.

Thanks Ian.

Regards,

--
Guy

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Building postgres requires bmake. Should it be a seperate package?
  - From: mitchell@mdd.comm.mot.com (Bill Mitchell)

Prev by Date: Bug#1283: dpkg and pre-existing but newly-designated control files
Next by Date: Bug#1232: Tin recommends C-News | INN
Previous by thread: Re: Building postgres requires bmake. Should it be a seperate package?
Next by thread: [iwj10@cus.cam.ac.uk: Package construction Guidelines]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread