On 04/03/2013 01:57 PM, Peter Pentchev wrote:
On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 01:27:48PM +0200, Tobias Hansen wrote:On 04/03/2013 01:12 PM, Peter Pentchev wrote:On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 11:47:53AM +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote:A quick look - sorry for the terse feedback. I don't know much about cdbs which limits my ability to review it very well. • the changelog targets unstable, but should target experimental if you want an upload prior to wheezy's releaseJust for the record, I'm not really sure whether this is true for new packages - I think newborn packages are not considered for testing migration at all, are they?premake 3.7 is in Wheezy. Are they both needed?I think the submitter explained that in the first message in the bug log - http://bugs.debian.org/696899#5 :)
The only reason why packages in unstable should not be updated is to keep the possibility to do updates of wheezy packages over unstable. New leafish packages in unstable are no problem at all.