[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#696899: can anybody sponsor an ITP for premake4 ?

On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 01:27:48PM +0200, Tobias Hansen wrote:
> On 04/03/2013 01:12 PM, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> >On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 11:47:53AM +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> >>A quick look - sorry for the terse feedback. I don't know much about cdbs which
> >>limits my ability to review it very well.
> >>
> >>   • the changelog targets unstable, but should target experimental if you
> >>     want an upload prior to wheezy's release
> >
> >Just for the record, I'm not really sure whether this is true for new
> >packages - I think newborn packages are not considered for testing
> >migration at all, are they?
> premake 3.7 is in Wheezy. Are they both needed?

I think the submitter explained that in the first message in
the bug log - http://bugs.debian.org/696899#5 :)


Peter Pentchev	roam@ringlet.net roam@FreeBSD.org p.penchev@storpool.com
PGP key:	http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc
Key fingerprint 2EE7 A7A5 17FC 124C F115  C354 651E EFB0 2527 DF13
This sentence was in the past tense.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: