Re: prboom+
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 11:26:36AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> I wonder why the prboom+ folks didn't just take over the prboom
> project, sourceforge probably still had their project takeover process
> in place in those days.
Because prboom wasn't inactive when prboom+ was started.
> > I guess i would package prboom+ and if nobody complained about the new
> > version, i'd drop prboom before Jessie freezes.
>
> Sounds like a good idea.
Sounds like a plan. I'll try and see whether the git repo I put on alioth
is useful or not.
Reply to: