Richard Hartmann <richih.mailinglist@gmail.com> (15/07/2008): > is not only a supertux issue, but still a program should not cause > this, Well, I'm pretty sure supertux has _very_ little to do with your TTYs. And if the display gets messed up this way, that might be totally unrelated to supertux anyway. That's why that doesn't qualify as a blocker to me. Anyway, I don't really care whether to push supertux 0.3 to unstable or not, I was just trying to remind people that it exists in experimental; and I'm just fighting bogus arguments here. > no matter what the safeguards are in place on the outside. Having to reboot a box is definitely _not_ related to supertux, at all. This is not about safeguards, this is about a buggy X. Which might be the culprit in the end. But without any bugreports, that's hard to tell. Mraw, KiBi.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature