Re: Newer vegastrike : can we package that big ?

To: "Moritz Muehlenhoff" <jmm@inutil.org>
Cc: debian-devel-games@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Newer vegastrike : can we package that big ?
From: "Richard Hartmann" <richih.mailinglist@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 16:02:48 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 2d460de70804150702k2135f3e3gcf65e62ef2a8c465@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] slrng073bf.35p.jmm@inutil.org>
References: <[🔎] 48006B1B.3020404@debian.org> <[🔎] e13a36b30804131935s742cc2cctbb8be8061ede38b1@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 87bq4col2x.fsf@vorlon.ganneff.de> <[🔎] slrng073bf.35p.jmm@inutil.org>

On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 6:59 PM, Moritz Muehlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org> wrote:

>  Does it really need to be an additional archive? I would propose
>  to use an additional archive section, like "data" and provide a
>  convenient way for mirror operators to opt this section in.

Prolly even better, yes.

Richard

Reply to:

References:
- Newer vegastrike : can we package that big ?
  - From: Vincent Fourmond <fourmond@debian.org>
- Re: Newer vegastrike : can we package that big ?
  - From: "Paul Wise" <pabs@debian.org>
- Re: Newer vegastrike : can we package that big ?
  - From: Joerg Jaspert <joerg@debian.org>
- Re: Newer vegastrike : can we package that big ?
  - From: Moritz Muehlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org>

Prev by Date: Re: my involvement
Next by Date: Biniax2
Previous by thread: Re: Newer vegastrike : can we package that big ?
Next by thread: Re: Newer vegastrike : can we package that big ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread