Re: Corriger dans woody ou pas?
>> "JM" == Jérôme Marant <jmarant@nerim.net> writes:
> Raphael Hertzog <hertzog@debian.org> writes:
[...]
>> Et pour y uploader c'est simple, dans le changelog là où il y a marqué
>> "unstable" tu marques "woody-proposed-updates".
> Oui mais ça ne me dit pas quels sont les critères pour l'acceptation
> de mes paquets ...
Les mêmes que pour les mise à jour de la potato ?
C'est quand assez restrictif.
,----
| 1. The package fixes a security problem. An advisory by our own
| Security Team would be quite helpful. I really should make this a
| requirement for security uploads.
|
| 2. The package fixes a critical bug which can lead into data loss,
| data corruption, or an overly broken system, or the package is
| broken or not usable (anymore).
|
| 3. The stable version of the package is not installable at all due to
| broken or unmet dependencies or broken installation scripts.
|
| 4. All released architectures have to be in sync.
|
| Packages, which I will most probably reject:
|
| . Package which fix non-critical bugs.
|
| . Misplaced uploads, i.e. packages that were uploaded to 'stable
| unstable' or `frozen unstable'.
|
| . Packages for which its binary packages are out of sync with regard
| to all supported architectures in the stable distribution.
|
| . Binary packages for which the source got lost somehow.
`----
Christian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-french-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: