Re: Every spam is sacred
On Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 05:05:14PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
>
> I repeat: a DNSBL is not software, nor documentation, it's an opinion,
> or the reflect of a fact ("the DSBL server has received a message
> saying "listme" from IP "foo" and contains cookie "bar").
>
> If we refuse to use anything we can't modify (when it's not software),
> we would have to stop reading the RFCs, but I don't think this would
> be a good thing for free software.
RFC's are standard definitions, and can be redistributed. The list you propose
to use can be modified, but not redistributed.
You are proposing to use a method that cannot be delivered to our users. And I
do not think that is a good idea.
mooch
--
Jesus Climent | Unix SysAdm | Helsinki, Finland | pumuki.hispalinux.es
GPG: 1024D/86946D69 BB64 2339 1CAA 7064 E429 7E18 66FC 1D7F 8694 6D69
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Registered Linux user #66350 proudly using Debian Sid & Linux 2.4.20
- ... todos necesitamos creer en algo.
- Si, yo también creo... Creo... que me voy a tomar una cerveza.
--Sor Trini (Año Mariano)
Reply to: