On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 08:48:51PM -0400, Noah Meyerhans wrote: > On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 06:24:46PM -0400, Duncan Findlay wrote: > > I still don't think Debian should enforce a filtering policy on > > developers e-mail address. It should really be done on an individual > > basis. > > Why are people *still* refusing to recognize the fact that *nobody* has > proposed server-side filtering of debian.org email! That is *not* what > this discussion is about! > > This discussion is about adding a header to messages that arrive from IP > addresses on some specific blacklist. *No* mail is going to be > rejected! This is merely going to aid individual developers in > filtering their own mail. Why are people so opposed to this? If you > don't want your mail to be affected by the use of this blacklist, it > won't, plain and simple. Then why are we going to use resources to scan it in the first place? The only reason this discussion is happening is because the only rationale for adding this header is to then move to full rejecting. I agree that if it's only about adding a header, this isn't a big deal, although I agree with debian-admin in that we don't need to use the extra bandwidth. -- Duncan Findlay
Attachment:
pgpGsxf2gmQK9.pgp
Description: PGP signature