Re: Bug#154829: Is a bug "grave" if the package is unusable for at least two architectures (Was: Bug#154829: Aido problems on 64 bit architectures)
On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 07:45:37PM -0500, Adam Majer <adamm@galacticasoftware.com> wrote:
> Your logic is flawed. *Most* users are most certainly i386.
> By saying that it does work for *most* users, then a package
> for Architecture: any that segfaults on all archs except i386,
> could not have grave bugs against it...
You snipped the part where I said, "fine, leave it grave." There's no
need to continue telling me why you think it should be grave. There
really isn't. There's not a "really, honestly, I totally think it's grave,
there's no need to keep telling me that it is" severity, so instead I'll
just say it on -devel again:
YOU WIN. IT'S GRAVE.
That fact probably does not make upstream any more responsive or really
provide ANY help WHATSOEVER with FIXING the damn thing, but hey, now
everyone knows it's grave. Surely that's an accomplishment worth noting.
(If I seem like I'm being overly rude or angry about this, don't take it
personally; I've recently quit smoking and I fear nobody can escape my
withdrawal-induced wrath)
--
Mike Markley <mike@markley.org>
GPG: 0x3B047084 7FC7 0DC0 EF31 DF83 7313 FE2B 77A8 F36A 3B04 7084
Oblivion together does not frighten me, beloved.
- Thalassa (in Anne Mulhall's body), "Return to Tomorrow", stardate 4770.3.
Reply to: